03 octobre 2009
Shilo: God bless you sister NADEGE
The lord hears our prayers and responds to them All according to his time. Click on the link bellow to view and listen what the Lord want you to be. By listening to this song from this gracious sister you will receive a blessing nothing else just a blessing. God bless as you listen.
JSBB
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QA94__uGBb4
16 septembre 2009
Jour "J" Moins 2

Jour « J » -2
< Voici le vent du changement qui transforme votre vie>
Il ya de cela plus de 2000 ans Jean Baptiste certifiat que Jésus-christ était le Messie. Il le fût faire au vu et au su de tous : Pharisiens, sadducéens, professionnels de la loi de leur époque et des autres peuples venus de partout pour se faire baptiser par lui de l’ autre coté du Jourdain . Au lendemain de son témoignage sur Christ a`Bethanie et lorsqu’ il y vu passer le fils de l’ homme au bord du fleuve, il déclara ce qui suit: « voici l’ agneau de Dieu qui ôte le péché du monde » Jean 1 : 29.
Par extraporation, Jean procéde à une présentation de Jésus-christ, comme le répondant au besoin de l’ humanité, c’est à lui seul sur qui désormais le salut des ames réposera et tirera son éssort, c’ est lui, l’ agneau qui est venu du ciel pour sauver l’ homme, lui rendre ce qui l’ a perdue : ses droits, son autonomie, sa supermacie sur toutes les autres créatures, sa géreance de la planète ( confer le jardin d’ Eden). En plus il reconcile l’ homme de Dieu son créateur. L’ agneau de Dieu completera la mission qui lui( Jean-Baptiste) avait été confiée; celle de préparer, applanir le chemin du Seigneur , annoncer la bonne nouvelle de l’ avénement du fils de l’ homme et de son royaume et à baptiser en eau ceux qui étaient prêts à le récevoir. Le changement de mentalité et la repentance, voilà les deux objectifs de sa mission. Doué d’ une honnêteté spirituelle et ministerielle sans precédent, Jean Baptiste révèle et indique aux habitants de la terre que Jesus-christ est le seul chemin à suivre pour le salut. Baptiser du Saint-Esprit et du feu ne faisait pas partie de sa mission, c’ est au fils de l’ homme que cela était dévolue. Jean Baptiste respectait tous les principes divins qu’ il a acquis dès le ventre de sa mère. La conception de Jean-Baptiste a été aussi miraculeuse, il fùt baptisé du St-Esprit dès le ventre de sa mère. En definitive, c’est l’ agneau de Dieu qui répond au besoin, au problème profond des ordres des habitants de la terre. Pas quelqu’ un d’ autre. C’ est bien lui qui étanchera la soif de ceux qui sont assoifés, restaurera l’ homme dans ses droits, lui délivrera des tous ses liens, sa captivité, donnera de l’ espoir et une vie nouvelle. Il est le fils qui est né de la femme dévergodée par le serpent ancien, le diable qui devra restaurer les descendants d’ Adam dans leur droits. Le droit de vivre éternellement comme cela fût recommendé par Elohim lui même. Aussi le droit d’ avoir une vie paradisiaque, celle qui est comblée de joie, plaisir et de l’ harmonie – Eden. Jean-Baptiste a vu en Christ l’ incarnation du salut des humains et de Dieu lui-même. Il vient du ciel il donne la vie en abondance et l’ esprit sans mesure ... Jesus –christ de Nazareth...
Jean- Baptiste n ‘a pas voulu cacher aux peuples de leur temps la vraie voie à suivre.
De même et aujourd’ hui l’ Eglise Internationale Sion dirigée par l’Apôtre Ben Bolengwa Jean-Pierre, vous lance le même appel a`l’ instard de Jean-baptiste et vous dit: <voici le vent du changement qui transforme votre vie arrivé enfin a`Paris>.
Tout au long de ces trois grandes journées dans la présence divine, soit du 18 septembre au 20 septembre de l’ année en cours, le vent du changement sera suspendu à Paris. La fraîcheur que procure le Saint-esprit s’ étendra sur l’ ensemble de l’ hexagone. Quiconque se rendra disponible, recevra sa portion, connaîtra à coup-sûr une transformation multidimensionelle. Que ça dire ? Cela veut tout simplement dire que toutes les sphères de votre vie seront affectées positivement. Les Serviteurs de Dieu veront leurs vies ministerielles radicalement métamophorsées à cause du vent de changement qui stationnera sur toute l’ etendue de l’ Hexagone avant de continuer son cours normal; les vies chrétiennes, conjugales, estudiantines, de carrières, d’ hommes d’ affaires, des politiciens, des hommes de science, la liste n’ est pas exhaustive seront radicalement transformées dans le sens du bien, du progrès, de la créativité, de l’ innovation. La joie, la paix et le vrai bonheur ne feront que s’ ensuivre....
Ils étaient a`plus de 100 a`l’ attente de la promesse faite par le Seigneur sur la venue du St-Esprit dans la chambre haute. Le jour de la pentêcote la promesse était accomplie. Le vent qui a souffert le jour de la pentêcote et envahi là où ils s’ étaient rassemblés et tous fut rempli du saint-esprit et de la puissance supernaturelle. Le discours de Pierre Apôtre de Jesus-christ oint prononcé ce jour-la`amena l’ evangile de Jesus aux quatre coins du globe et apporta du changement dans la vie de beaucoup de personnes.
Ce vent souffle encore aujourd’ hui et il remplira l’ édifice qui abritera la convention du 17 au 21 Septembre
Ne manquez pas cette opportinuité qui nous est offerte....
Nous vous aimons tous et soyez les bienvenus !
Pasteur Jean Richard Imbile.
24 août 2009
“What is social about religion? Analyse the role religion plays in the social organisation of society.”
INTRODUCTION
All human beings dwelling on this planet practise diverse activities for the purpose of staying alive and maintaining a balance between their physical, mental and social life. Religion is amongst those activities, and it is accomplished by individuals who believe in the existence of a supreme being with a sovereign power. This assertion may not be proved by scientific methods or sociological thinkers’ approaches.
The configuration of society depends on different factors; and since centuries, religion and churches in particular have played, and continue to play, a tremendous function in modelling societies. The religious implication in societal existence has positive and negative effects. To respond to the question: what is social for religion and analyse the role plays by the church in the organisation of society, it is plausible to consider: both sociological and scientific approaches to religion, the relationship between the church and society and finally to look at some particular study cases on a global scale.
Body
Classical sociological thinkers such as Emile Durkheim Karl Marx and Max Weber have analysed each issue, with a sociological approach to the concept of religion. At the stage of defining the term religion, Emile Durkheim states that religion is a system of beliefs and rites which has a tendency to separate things into two categories, the sacred and the profane (Morrison, 2001:p.191). In contrast, Karl Marx defines religion as the opium of people. The notion of eternal life as preached by many churches procures people hope for the after- life. Their current struggles due to injustice and discrimination while still alive are compensated with the notion of eternity. (Giddens, 1995: p.464). Finally, Max Weber underlines that religion is one of the various social ingredients engendering the financial shift that leads to capitalism. (Morrison, 2001: p.225). Furthermore, the scientific approach describes religion as an abstract element of social life which cannot provide evidence. The study of the natural world by scientists is confirmed by the fact that researchers can observe, test and probe the substance of phenomena and provide evidence. (Bilton & eds, 2002: p.414)
Anthony Giddens, on his book: Sociology and Introduction, pp459-464; divides religion in four main groups: cultural, Monotheist, polytheist and ethical religions. Totemism and animism are cultural beliefs that are encountered in social groups with small number of population. Totemism is defined as a belief in some types of plants and animals supposed to hold supernatural powers. Animism means the belief in a spirit or ghosts, living in the same globe than human beings. In contrary to Totemism, animism is seen and practised in big cultural cities. Besides this group, stands a religious tripartite made of Judaism, Christianity and Islam. This set of religions is well known and has huge influence in societies. Their belief is centred in one God.
Judaism has existed prior to the birth of Christianity and Islam. The belief is grounded on prophets and God. Also, Judaism is considered to be the official religion of Jewish people who underwent persecutions until the creation of Israel
Christianity was established by Jesus’ followers who called him the Messiah. First believers were tortured by anti-Christ activists. But later, Christianity became one the most popular religions of that time. Yet, in the modern time, Christianity has more adherents in the world scale than any other religion.
Islam came from prophet Mahomet teachings. It is understood that the prophet exercised his ministry prior to Jesus’. Furthermore, Muslims believe that Allah is God and Mahomet is his prophet; also dogmas established by the Islamic institution have to be respected by members.
Hinduism is a polytheist religion of the far eastern part of the world. This doctrine has existed before Islam and Christianity. The key points of the Hindus’ faith are based on the principle of incarnation, social and ritual hierarchical predisposition of individuals. Hinduism has reverence to other religious confessions, and stands beside Islam in terms of number of members.
The final piece of general information about types of religion ends by the ethical religions. This group of religions consists of Buddhism, Confucianism and Taoism. The teachings of Siddhartha Gautama served as the basic element of the foundation of Buddhism. The focus of this belief is the escape of reincarnation through the rejection of desires. Also, by means of self-control and meditation individuals get salvation. Confucianism was founded by Confucius and aims to moderate human life throughout the interior harmony of nature insisting on the worship of ancestors. Taoism was set up by Lao-Tze and shares the same beliefs that Confucianism. One particular aspect of this belief is that it claims for non-violence approach. The definition on religion and different types of beliefs demonstrates how social life can be affected by those spiritual ideologies.
Religious practices operate in communities belonged to states. And the relationship between church and state has always been a crucial matter to handle from a sociological viewpoint. As mentioned by Share, Tovey & Corcoran in their book : A sociology of Ireland, pp 308- Durkheim and Weber have analysed in depth the connection linking religious bodies and social life. According to Durkheim, the effects engendered by religious conviction are numerous, notably: communal solidarity, community control and determination of the essence of human being existence. Moreover, the church as institution fixes rules and norms which have an effect on members and society at large. This is performed by a communal contribution in sacrament and symbols; the observation of established dogmas and discernment between good and evil. These regulations canalise people’s attitude within society. In contrast, a matter of interest for Weber was the correlation between Protestantism and capitalism. Weber argued that Protestantism played a role in revealing societies’ inhabitants the benefit of work, communal values and social deed. Furthermore, he stressed on part played by Protestant religion in Western Europe Ireland Ireland
The Irish post-famine period allowed the Catholic congregation to emerge as a powerful force in Ireland Irish Free State Vatican Ireland
In simplest terms secularisation describes “the process by which sectors of society and culture are removed from the dominion of religious institutional and symbols” (Share, Tovey & Corcoran: p.324). It is difficult to know what besides public discourse might suggest that things have changed in Ireland Ireland Ireland Ireland Ireland Ireland
In additional, technology development and economic prosperity observed in the last decades in this country lead to a reorientation of belief and consecration. The consideration of God’s matters is no longer as effective as it used to be. Responding to a call for ministry by the youth has been drastically dropped. In addition, the wave of migration to Ireland Ireland Ireland Ireland Ireland Ireland
Elsewhere, in the world the social implication of the religion is unlike than in Ireland United Kingdom
The separation between church and state is well established in the US US
Conclusion
Having considered the social effects produced by religious practices and the role plays by religion in the organisation of society, it is plausible to note that religions have different backgrounds, meanings, values and can generate different effects in individuals’ social lives and in society as a whole. Its relationship with the state and its contribution in the shaping of society organisation is effective despite the fact that societies around the world which are not religious fundamentalists continue to become more secular.
23 août 2009
Essay Title: Write an essay on two sources of law within Irish Legal System
Introduction
Primary and secondary sources of law constitute fundamental genesis of law within Irish legal system. From these sources are drawn ingredients, principles which pervade to the establishment of a body of rules that governs the state and guarantees the implementation of a fair legal system. In additional to this, superior and inferior sources are vital tools of reference towards legal practitioners. They facilitate them to locate the suitable legal instrument in which they can rely on for the administration of reasonable justice when conflicts occur.
This essay aims to examine two selected sources of law within Irish Legal System in each category mentioned above. In the following lines it would essential to consider, the background of each source of law, the features it bears and its position in relation to the modern Irish Legal System
Body
The Oxford Dictionary Law defines common law, as part of English law based on rules developed by the royal courts during the first three centuries after the Norman Conquest (1066) as a system applicable to the whole country, as opposed to local customs. For the sake of conquest of more territories Normand crossed the border and invaded Ireland in 1170 thus, they brought with them the common law. The British colonist brought and set up a new legal system in order to dominate the native Irish citizens and have full control over the nation. Despite, the imposition of a new legal system by the British, the existed system did not disappear and was still in use in some part of the country as the colonizer occupation was mainly based in the Pale, eastern part the actual Dublin.
As examined by Raymond Byrne and McCutcheon in Irish legal System, common law was the only legal instrument used by judges for conviction or acquaintance of individuals in early days of Irish history. The verdicts taken by Judges were based on the doctrine of precedent. These case reference procedures constituted an entity of rules which cannot be altered by any laws emanating from others origins; this privilege enjoyed by the common law duels in the modern Irish law. Byrne & Mccutcheon: Irish Legal System: Sources of Law, p7
Nevertheless, common law has feature of being flexible; and had recognised the existed customary law known as Brehon Law. Moreover Common law remains an important source law within Irish legal system.
Bunreacht Na hÉireann is defined as the law of the land, which has been adopted by the people in 1937 after a referendum. It represents the Irish values, their Identity and respond to their aspirations. Furthermore, it is based on fundamental principles which protect every single individual right. Irish Constitution establishment put an end to the existence of British Legal System which endured for several decades. This new Constitution was desperately needed because the1922 Constitution of Irish Free State contained lots of provisions which were not pertaining to the issues of national interest. In additional to this, the concept of nationalism was not perceived in the same manner by the Irish Nationalists. The 1937 Irish Constitution clarified those divergences and the unclear details left by the precedent Constitution. According to Andrei Marmor constitutional documents main features are as follows: supremacy, longevity, rigidity, moral content, generality and abstraction (Andrei Marmor: Interpretation and Legal Theory, Chap. 9, p141) Considering this description of Andrei Marmor in regards to the Irish Constitution it appears plausible that Bunreacht Na hÉireann enjoys most of these characteristics. . The supremacy of the Irish Constitution is expressed in fact that it has put into place a well coordinated and ordered legal system where all laws of the Republic must refer to. Therefore, all others judiciary bodies recognise the Irish Constitution as the basic law of the state. Laws with provenance from any others sources have to confer their constitutionality to the Constitution provisions. Any laws which infringe the provisions of Constitution cannot pass and is declared unacceptable and illegal. Added to this, its longevity is well established, since its adoption by people after a referendum in 1937 the Irish Constitution is in existence and continues to canalise the judiciary apparatus of this nation throughout the current generation and those to come. The Constitution of Ireland is reputable of being rigid because it is amendable only by a popular referendum. Since its establishment in 1937 it has been amended 27 times from 1939 where the first amending act passed until 2004 for the last amending act. (Constitution of Ireland: Amending acts, pp iv-xiii). With light of the Constitution amendments frequency it appears that Bunreacht Na hÉireann is difficult to amend.
“The more difficult it is to amend the Constitution, the more rigid it is” (Andrei Marmor: Interpretation and Legal Theory, Chap. 9, p141) The Constitution of Ireland satisfies to moral content and generality in fact that it has set up a separation of powers. The Executive, the Legislation and the Judiciary represent the 3 main organs of the Republic. These tripartite organs function on basis of autonomy which creates stability and good working of the state apparatus. Also, human and civil rights of citizens are respected as stipulated in articles 44-45 of the Constitution. And finally, the Constitution of Ireland is a written Constitution, different from the British Constitution which is unwritten. Under that written shape the Constitution of Ireland is available to every citizen for consultation; its accessibility is made easier by the fact that it has been written in both languages: English and Irish.
The simplest definition of canon law is the church law. In the beginning it was composed of a numbers of canons, but later on it was assorted by the late medieval era. Generally speaking, Canon law subsists away from the state law and does not possess the force of law. Nevertheless, in some cases legal dispositions in relation to marriage law have been formulated as their canon law corresponding. (Raymond Byrne & McCutcheon: Irish Legal System: Sources of Law, p7). Ireland is a country of strong belief in Catholicism. Its traditions reflect that. Obviously, the law of the church had to be involved in the governance of the nation and restore order when the law it is breached. This involvement of the church law is clearly stated in the Preamble of Bunreacht Na hÉireann: [In the Name of Most Holy Trinity, from Whom is all authority and to whom, as our final end, all actions f both of men and states must be referred, we the people of Éire, humbly acknowledging all our obligations to our Divine Lord, Jesus Christ, who sustained our fathers through centuries of trial……..] The Custom law served as law prior the implementation of the England common law in Ireland. Both laws co-existed for centuries until the beginning of the 17th Century, where Custom was absorbed by Common Law. Even though it was absorbed, custom law was granted recognition by the common law and kept on playing its part. Also custom has to fulfil certain criteria such as being certain, reasonable and continuous in order to obtain legal power. Furthermore, its field of action and existence was subject to restrictions. (Byrne & Mccutcheon: Irish Legal System: Sources of Law, p7). Custom Law played a considerable role in establishing justice between Irish Native in conflict. Its incorporation in common law of that time has arguably to be considered as a means used by the Settlers to have full control of whole nation: geographically and legally. Conclusion The examination of Superior and Inferior selected sources of law within Irish Legal System throughout this essay has demonstrated that the Irish Laws emanate from diverse origins which have particular historical backgrounds; vital features; and occupy a specific place in Irish Law. The judicial ingredients produced by these sources make the Irish Legal System one of the well established and structured legal systems at the present time.
Law of Contract 1st Assignment ( 1 BA legal Science)
1st BA Contract Assignment 2008
Penelope places an advertisement in the Galway Advertiser stating that she wishes to let out commercial premises in the city centre. Anna, who is based in Dublin, sees the advertisement and enters negotiations for the lease. These negotiations take place by means of fax and telephone. Penelope eventually sends a fax setting out all her terms. Anna replies by fax, agreeing to all the terms and stating that the premises must be redecorated at Penelope’s expense before she moves in. She ends with the words “there is no need to contact me”. Penelope replies by letter, saying that she will be happy to redecorate. Due to a partial strike by postal workers, the letter does not reach Anna until five days after it was posted. In the meantime, Anna finds cheaper premises in Galway and sends a fax to Penelope telling her that she will not be leasing her property. Penelope believes that she has a contract with Anna and wishes to sue her for breaching it. Advise Penelope.
The issues which arise in this problem are invitation to treat, counter-offer, and acceptance of a counter-offer, intention to enter legal relations, rejection and the postal-rule. An offer may be defined as a clear, unambiguous statement of the terms upon which the offeror is prepared to contract should the offeree decide to accept. Conversely, statements of terms which do not purport the implementation of a valid contract in case they were agreed to the offeree are called “an invitation to treat”.
An invitation to treat is an expression of willingness to embark on negotiations with the other party to see whether agreement can be reached.
A couple of situations have been considered as an invitation to treat over the years. Notably, the display of goods in a shop window Gibson v Manchester City Council and Fisher v. Bell; the display of goods in a self service shop in Pharmaceutical Society v. Boots Cash Chemists and R. v. Dawood; the advertisements seen in Wilson v. Belfast Corporation and Grainger & Sons v. Gough. In this later, a supply of catalogue for different types of wines by a wine trade was not considered to be an offer.
The general principle regarding advertisements is that they constitute purely an invitation to treat and cannot be held as an offer. This was demonstrated in Wilson v. Belfast Corporation. The same outcome was reserved to the litigant in Partridge v. Crittenden. Nonetheless, some exceptional cases related to advertisements amounted as an offer correspondingly in Carlill v Carbolic Smoke ball and Billings v. Arnott.
Also, auctions and applications for tenders have been viewed as an invitation to treat. This was established in Harris v. Nickerson. Moreover, in Tully v. Irish Land Commission, goods had to be sold without reserve; this represented a mixture of an invitation to treat and an offer. Similarly to auctions, applications for tenders have been treated as invitation to treat in Boyers & Co. v. Duke and Harvey v. Facey.
In general social, domestic and family agreements do not intent to create legal contract; except if it is explicitly defined. This is demonstrated in Smith v. Huges, Balfour v. Balfour and Merritt v. Merritt. Nonetheless, parties engaged to an agreement with a commercial business create legal relations unless the contrary. As in Rose & Crompton and Edwards v. Skyways. In this later, the defendant claimed that the use of the term ``ex-gratia'' understood that it was not intended to create legal relations. But, the court decided that this was insufficient argument to refute the assumption that commercial transactions are contractual.
A counter-offer is a response to an offer, made to the offeror by the offeree, which seeks either to introduce a new term or to vary an existing term of the offer. The effect of a counter-offer is to extinguish the original offer and the counteroffer then becomes the communication that is capable of acceptance. This was confirmed in Jones v. Daniel and Swan v. Miller. It is vital to note that a counteroffer can be accepted in case of request of information as seen in Stevenson v McLean;
Acceptance as a general rule must be communicated to the party making the offer by the party accepting the offer. An acceptance is effective from the moment it is communicated and reaches the offeror. This has been seen in Entorses v. Miller Far East Corporation. However, there are exceptions whether the proper means of communicating acceptance is by post and performance of some acts. The acceptance is valid when the letter is posted. In Kelly v. Cruise Catering Ltd, a valid contract of employment took place at the moment Kelly who lived in Dublin posted his letter of contract acceptance to the company which recruited in Norway. In case of unilateral: Carlill and Billings, communication of acceptance was consumed by act and performance. The mode of communication plays a crucial role in acceptance of an offer as seen in Quener Cluain v. Cole. The mode of communication prescribed should be respected by both parties doing otherwise renders the act invalid. This is seen in Eliason v Henshaw and Tinn v. Hoffmann& Co.
Rejection is one of the ways by which an offer can be terminated. The freedom of contract dispositions give rights to every offeree to reject an offer at any time prior its acceptance.
An acceptance by Post brings in operation the “postal rule” which provide that a contract exits when the letter of acceptance is posted not when it reaches the offeror. In Sanderson v. Cunningham as the contract was not concluded in Ireland the claim failed. The Irish court of appeal held that the contract concluded by posting it in London. Also in Dooley v. Egan. Postal rule does not apply during a strike by postal workers and in the case of revocation.
Penelope’s advertisement in the Galway Advertiser constitutes an invitation to treat.
Nothing clear and specific is mentioned at this stage purporting this invitation to treat to be considered as an offer. Anna who lives in Dublin enters bargain with Penelope for the lease of the property using fax and telephone as methods of communication. In response to the offer, Anna agrees to all terms of the lease but adds news terms in fax message: an obligation for the redecoration of the premise on Penelope’s expense before she moves in.” This is a counteroffer which destroys the initial offer. The plaintiff and the defendant are engaged in a commercial agreement. Therefore, there is presumption to create legal relations, which has not been rebutted, as terms for a lease sent by the plaintiff were agreed by the defendant. Defendant words “No need to contact me” are beside the point and cannot dismiss the contractual aspect of commercial deals. Penelope accepts the counteroffer and communicated to Anna in a letter by post. In general rule, once an acceptance is made it has to be communicated to the other party. Furthermore, an acceptance is effective at the moment it reaches the party who makes the offer. At this stage Anna did not receive any valid acceptance from Penelope; therefore she was under no obligation to terminate the offer by rejection at any time. She communicated to Penelope by fax stating that she will no longer leasing her premises even though communication does not apply on termination of an offer.
It is unclear whether or not there were any prescribed methods of communication of an acceptance. Nonetheless, it is mentioned in this case that negotiations were made through Fax and Telephone. By using post instead of Fax and Telephone considered in this case as instantaneous means of communication, Penelope‘s acceptance of Anna’s counter offer can be seen as invalid as she accepted it by another method.
Penelope’s letter of acceptance reached Anna five days after it has been posted due to a partial strike of postal workers. In the normal situation, Penelope’s letter of acceptance would be completed at the moment she posted it by applying the postal rule. This would make it a valuable acceptance. However, as Penelope’s was sent during a partial strike of postal workers, the postal rule does not apply. As a result, there was no valid acceptance from Penelope and Anna was not legally bound with Penelope offer. In this respect there was no completed contract and no breach of contract.
In summary, the resolution in this case depends on two elements: the acceptance of a counteroffer and the application of the postal rule.
If Penelope’s acceptance of Anna’s counteroffer is effective and valid; the initial offer made by Penelope in which Anna agreed to all its terms by sending a fax, remains alive and a valid contract was completed at that moment. Anna’s termination of an offer by rejection communicated to Penelope by Fax would be considered as a repudiation of contract. If the court decides to treat likewise partial strike by postal workers and absolute strike, therefore the postal rule would not apply and Penelope’s acceptance of Anna’s counter-offer was not communicated to her, prior her decision to terminate the offer. Consequently, Anna’s was not lawfully bound by any contract terms. Her rejection of Penelope’s offer would not be considered as a violation of contract.
Topic: Can terrorist acts of violence be morally justified? Discuss with reference to Ted Honderich’s concept of “Terrorism
Terrorist acts of violence express the existence of Terrorism network. For decades, these acts have been perpetrated under suicide or state terrorism shape. Therefore, they should not be perceived as a new phenomenon. Nonetheless, since the September 11th terrorist attacks in 2001 the word terrorism has been amplified and become one of the most sensible to listen to. Terrorist acts of aggression engender multiple effects towards the victims and the witnesses. Surprisingly, they serve as an act of achievement acknowledged in perpetrator’s side. In this situation where it seems to be difficult to comprehend who is wrong and who is right, it is of necessity to call upon philosophical theories in order to establish the truth and particularly the moral justification of terrorist acts of violence. For this reason, this essay refers to the principle of “Terrorism for humanity as portrayed by Ted Honderich. This paper is subdivided in three main parts. The first part focuses primarily on the general spectrum of information on terrorism and violence including terminology definitions, today’s main terrorists’ organisations, recent terrorists attacks in particular the 11 September 2001 on US soil, Gaza and Israel started at the end of 2008 and early this year. Next point to look at would be the consequences of violent terrorists’ attacks especially in countries where those attacks have been carried out and what was the response in term of reprisal and justification. And finally, Ted Honderich’s principle of “Terrorism for Humanity” will be considered.
In the simplest term terrorism can be defined as
A use of physical force that injures, damages, violates or destroys people or things, with a political and social intention, and whether or not intended to cause fear to people in general, and raising a question of its moral justification-either illegal violence within a society or violence between states and society not according to international law, and smaller-scale than war. (Honderich, 2003,p15).
Two main types of terrorism exist. Suicide terrorism and state terrorism. The first type practices are conducted by members of fundamentalists’ organisation in particular Muslims extremists. In philosophical point of view, terrorists can be viewed as ontologists; they act according to their belief and give less value to human being. The second one: state terrorism aims to the maintenance of power by those who rule. For example, fear against communist spreading out lead US in committing acts of violence in numerous countries around the world. (Barker, 2000, pp81-84). Surprisingly, state acts of violence have moral justification.
There are several terrorist organisations such as ETA in Spain Japan Palestine Gaza Africa United States
McCann (2006) argues that on reprisal to the attacks the USA Patriot Act 2001 was enacted and implemented. War on terror was therefore declared. The deployment of Americans soldiers in Afghanistan Iraq US Afghanistan Iraq US
Palestine Israel Palestine Israel Israel Gaza Israel Gaza Gaza Egypt Gaza
Dershowitz (2002) discusses that a total of 73 Palestinian terrorists acts have been perpetrated in different countries of the world from July 22, 1968 to September 4, 1997. Furthermore, Palestinians have received 33 benefits from several organisations, states and religious figures such as United Nations Organisation, Presidents of USA and the Popes. The search was conducted from December 10, 1997 to March 22, 2000.
As a consequentialist, Ted Honderich points out, that terrorism in all its form affects, the vulnerable individual depraving this later from the basic natural rights which are: life, freedom and access to property as John Lock predicted. Furthermore, he states that, the terrorism for humanity goes against the principal of humanity. The killing of innocent by acts of violence in all its kind makes it difficult for the innocent to prosper and have a decent life. Zionism and new Zionism against Palestinians perpetrated by Israelis undervalue their lives and imprison them in their own land. This leaves Palestinians with no other alternative than to use terrorist acts of violence. Due to Israel
O’Murchadha (2006) points out that, when dealing with violence the philosophical approach must consider the three following elements: perpetrator, victim, and witness. These three representations are not dissociable in terms of moral accountability. The perpetrator is liable for causing harm, physical or psychological to the victim. The victim is attacked because there can be a direct or indirect relationship with the aggressor. The witness shares the guiltiness because of not doing anything to prevent or condemn acts of violence.
In the light of all arguments and counter-arguments on terrorism mentioned throughout this paper, it seems plausible to state that terrorists’ attacks are morally wrong because they kill innocents’ people, destroy their homes, businesses; affect their lives and health in present and future time. Furthermore, their acts bring terror and fear, destabilise institutions and governmental policies. As a matter of fact, any state or government around the world has moral obligation to protect its citizens and territorial integrity. Once, these prerogatives have been breached it is of duty to use self-defence rights. However, perpetrators’ acts are arguably justified as they have reasonable grounds which explain their actions, though refused for acceptance by the victims. Any country in the world will struggle to condone the occupation of its territory. In fact it would constitute a call for war. Palestinians and particularly Hamas perpetrate suicide terrorism against Israel
This essay has considered violence terrorist attacks and the moral aspect of it by applying Ted Honderich’s principle of “Terrorism of Humanity”. The concept of the word terrorism is difficult to define, therefore it renders the conflict without resolution as the perpetrators and the victims have different grounds of reasons justifying their positions. The witness brought into the circle of violence left confused and undecided. But by applying, the principal of humanity according Ted the issue gets clarification on how to apprehend and understand it. The recognition of reasons of terrorists’ violence attacks by the victim and the respect of human values by the perpetrator and the impartial judgement of the witness might put and an end to this conflict and save innocent lives.
My Philosophy Essay 1 BA 2008-2009.
DATE: 5TH DECEMBER 2008
ESSAY TOPIC: "WHAT DOES NIETZSCHE MEAN BY A TRANSVALUATION OF VALUES? WHY DOES HE THINKS SUCH A TRANSVALUATION IS NECESSARY? HOW CAN IT BE ACHIEVED?"
According to Nietzsche human being existence does not necessary depend on a pre-existence pattern of values. Therefore, human beings bear accountability to create news values in order to sustain their own lives.
This essay discusses the meaning of a transvaluation of values according to Nietzsche, the motives underpinning its establishment and how can this process be achieved. In order to analyse the true meaning of this mechanism I would consider to define the main terms of the topic, secondly look at several issues from history, philosophy, modernism which may have attracted Nietzsche passion on values and finally it will be of necessity to look at how practically this procedure of re-evaluation of principles can be fulfilled.
From a philosophical perspective, values are categorized in two sets: subjective and objective. Subjective values refer to a personal stance, occupying a sort of choice, and immune to rational argument. This includes a kind of reverence and respect. In contrast, objective values can be guided and corrected from a standpoint, regardless of the existence of the requirements of rationality, human nature, God, or other authority and choice. The creation of new values involves a systematic method used by Nietzsche. This method is named transvaluation of values. In the simplest terms Nietzsche defines a transvaluation of values as the process of surmounting the reigning decadent and corrupt ethical principles. As above described, values are norms established by the rulers of institutions, corporations, communities, religion and philosophical idealism as Plato’s. These dogmas constitute forces which heavily weigh on human beings and undermine their capacity of creation. Nietzsche considers men of being able to create news values which are conform and can respond to their personal needs. Furthermore, he states that men are the relevant sources of their values. Through their senses, human beings are sufficiently up to create news ethical precepts. It does not require a standard of values so that human life can be productive or prosperous. Standardized moral values serve as prudence and safeguard towards social order. But, Nietzsche argues that, social tranquillity advocated by the rulers and philosophers does not procure happiness to the human beings. In contrary, this subordination freezes their performance in day to day life. Also, individuals are encapsulated as wells as their abilities to invent, restructure and actualize ethical principles.
Nietzsche thinks that a transvaluation of values is important because old standards do not reflect the current individual identity. They do represent the old man who had an old-fashioned apprehension towards the cosmos and its inhabitants. The world might be considered as a dynamic unity and those who dwell in it, are supposed to follow the course of all metamorphoses which are occurring in space and in time. In this stage, Nietzsche appeals to philosophy to be considered as art rather than a science of fiction and illusion. As he describes the artist’s sense of truth that is based on his availability to plunge himself in the deepest part of his existence, segment it into pieces and extract what is meaningful for life. Consequently this practice benefits at priori to the individual and serves as a shield of protection against the anti-values. Any other process which does not cadre with his method of creation has no impact (Nietzsche, p125). He stresses that, Platonism’s tradition offers nothing more then distraction of individuals. Human beings are subjected to be just consumers instead of being productive. What has been established is enough. Additionally, he argues that Plato thoughts on moral standard, existence of real world, essence, eternal truths, appearance, reason, are pure imaginary tales. In relation to morality, Nietzsche states that individuals are held accountable for their actions committed in society. The judgement classes actions into just and unjust. In Nietzsche viewpoint, the decision in relation to human beings actions should not be based only on the principle of good and evil. In contrary, it should be extended to the search of true motivations and nature of their acts. Usually men are punished for grieves caused by their actions. However, Nietzsche states that man’s nature, his motives, his actions and effects he engenders cannot hold him accountable. Because, accountability itself is based on an error.
Yet, the moral standard has been dominated by Christianity. This concept of religion put men in slavery by making promises which are unfulfilled since centuries. The belief in an invisible God engenders a physical weakness into human beings lives. And yet, Christianity represents a superpower in which individual can count and surrender themselves. That enables those who accept as true that spiritual strength to stand firm in time troubles. Christianity has established the basic ethical precepts which may have featured individuals living in communities. Those of individuals, who do not proffer Christianity and their forces, are simply considered as evil or negative forces. Christianity ensures human individuals for the after-life. This kind of statement is viewed by Nietzsche as compromising individual lives in the present and in the future. Also, Christianity has made everyone blind and intoxicated with hymns and Eucharistic songs. It seems so difficult to see the way out. Everyone is suffering with blindness and is kept in darkness. Christianity exposes human beings to the eternal obscurantism. The analogy of Smile of the Sun can be profitable to this category of individual beings affected by Christianity sightlessness.
The sun, I think you will agree, not only makes we see visible, but causes the process of generation, growth and nourishment, without itself being such a process (Plato, 509b, p235).
After rejecting Christianity, Nietzsche states the death of God. God has been killed along with the metaphysical approaches and the basic values which incarcerated human being. Consequently, the spaced occupied by these values is vacuumed.
This situation makes an appeal to Nihilism a theory promoting the state of believing in nothing, or of having no allegiances and no purpose.
One of the reasons which push Nietzsche to opt for a transvaluation of values is modernity and capitalism.
Modernity has brought prosperity, welfare, good conditions for life to human beings. Science and industrialisation work instead of man. A system based on life routine is set to manage individual social life and its outcome. Physical body is well treated and the spiritual remain in a permanent lethargy. Inactivity is prized as a common way of living. Creativity is not in agenda simply buried. Nietzsche considers, modernity not helping human beings to progress, to challenge the statuquo and become more inventive. But, capitalism profits on the labor of the weak. Human beings is used a tool machine of production, regardless his state. Work becomes the keystone point of his life. This relationship between man and his work creates an unbreakable link, leading to exploitation. Where the dividends of his work are dedicated to another class of individuals called themselves as the bourgeoisie. Therefore, according to Nietzsche, human beings are just used as animals who cannot think about their own existence. That’s why he aims to a transvaluation of values. The main question that remains is how to achieve that process?
In order to accomplish his project, Nietzsche proceeds to the rejection of Platonism’s tradition, to the Decoration of the death of God, the nihilism and anti- nihilism, the creation of will of power and the identification of Superman.
By rejecting Platonism’s tradition Nietzsche replaces old norms by the news ones which touches human being true substance of his existence. These values are not borrowed from somewhere else, they emanate within the individual himself. Moreover, they are not another man made product, but his own invention. Next, Nietzsche proclaims the decoration of the death of God. God was at the centre of the establishment of the moral standard tradition. The death of God means the death of standard ethical principles. Consequently, all yokes are broken and the freedom of man and his will may be inevitable. This state favours human being to be imaginative. Another step is the nihilism anti-nihilism. The inexistence of any belief gives man opportunity to human beings to built confidence and trust. This helps for his development and progress. Individual life will no longer be directed by any traditional ethical dogmas. Anti-nihilism, warns human beings on reprisals which may come due the emptiness state left after the rejection of Plato’s Christianity and the death of God. Added to this, the will of power would enable individual beings to create what has not been created before. This strength and determination to creativity will positively impact society as a whole. The will of power will inward each individual member of the community. The purpose of this will of power is not merely to satisfy individual desires but to serve as new moral principles of innovation and creation of values. Those from community who will remain to their commitment will sacred Supermen.
This essay has discussed the meaning of a transvaluation of values according to Nietzsche, the reasons grounded his new policy and how the process can be achieved. By a transvaluation of values Nietzsche means that old values are to be assessed and replaced by new ones and human being is the artisan of that task. Reasons for the establishment of that process are the effects produced by traditional moral standard. And finally, rejecting old-fashioned norms coupled with a drive to will for power might be considered as tools of paramount important for a duplicate success, meaning human being life and Nietzsche’s transvaluation of values project.
BIBLIOGRAPHY.
Hollingdale R.J: A Nietzsche Reader (2003), Penguin books, England
Perry J. and eds.: Introduction to Philosophy, Classical and Contemporary Readings, (2007) Oxford University Press, New York
17 août 2009
Mon commentaire sur la Conscience et l' Inconscience.
L' homme conscient a la maîtrise sur tous les paramètres qui regissent son existence, il script tout acte posé, procède au monitoring de sa vie et ceci au quotidien. A cette instance il jouit de toutes ses facultés tant mentales, spirituelles, qu' intellectuelles, il maîtrise son environnement, ses pensées, en grosso modo tout le cosmos. Il agit comme au Jardin d' Eden avant la chute de cet dernier. Donc à l' étape initiale de sa création où le créateur lui dota de toutes les capacités et potentialités pour dompter le monde et toute sa substance. L' homme d' esprit pur et irréprochable est conscient de tout et ne se repent que peu de ses actes; car ils lui sont bénéfiques de même qu'à son prochain. L' homme avec esprit bienveillant, intègre assujetit l' inconscience ou le subconscient et le rend inactif et inopérationnel. Donc, la pureté d' esprit et de conscience font suite à l' Inhibition de l' inconscience, c' est une opération naturelle qui ne demande pas trop d' exercises, genre: Hypnotisme et autre. L' homme crée à l' image et à la ressemblance de Dieu a la maîtrise sur tout, entendu conscience et inconscience. L' homme incarne une puissance, une force qui lui permet de se positionner au dessus de la melé de tout ce qui existe. Ce qui manque c' est seulement une prise de conscience et de la connaissance sur la posséssion des ses capacités. Descartes à l' instard de Jésus-Christ n' ont rien écrit d' eux-mêmes; ces sont leurs adeptes ou disciples qui l' ont faits en leur place. Platon l' élève fidèle à Descartes représente le personnage Descartes au lieu et place du Descartes historiquement connu. Jésus-Christ aussi, ses apôtres ont écrit les evangiles et d' autres récits. Ces deux hommes avaient un esprit dominant à la fois sur leur conscience et Inconscience. Mon peuple périt par faute de connaissance. La réflexion continue... Pasteur Jean Richard Imbile.
16 août 2009
Un Commentaire sur les BONGILI
Merci mon frère pour toutes ces révélations. Un adage de chez nous dit ceci: " si tu ne sais pas où tu vas quand même connais d' où tu viens" C' est d' où tu viens que tu tires ton existence, là où sortent tes racines, tes valeurs, tes traditions, tes repères, ton identité culturelle et sociale. Celui ou celle qui oublie ses origines ignore son existence et de ce fait il ne représente rien dans ce monde. Tes origines c' est l' un des paramètres clé de ta différenciation, elles font de toi un personnage unique avec un morphotype singulier. C' est la source même de ta fierté. Mais comment mon cher!!!!Merci le Franco.
Ndjósépélá nmómgó ntsin' éa lokotsi lonke na belenda boloi bokis' o bwa báná bá Bongili. Toi'me bósiká bankoko bakiso baki nde baende ba bóló, ba nkasó. Na lina dja Ndjakomb' ea mpamba baólongaka bituma mpé báoyi ndéngé la ndéngé. Bao tótsikela bonkoko bólelá bia buke bia nsósólá, bia nkánélá lolenge l'okiy' óbikéláká. Tóófelaké bonkonko elombe!!!
N..B: IYAUMAKA BANA BA BONGILI, BATANGAKI NA BOTEKA-FLANDRIA, MAKAKO( DWALI), BOENDE ETC...BAKISI NA MPOTO LONKOTELE NA ADRESSE ENE: shaloom25@hotmail.com
Eonga te tosanganye wana, baoko bakiso ntsin' ea tolake bana ba kiso babikela ane na mpoto, bonkonko o'kiso; towatefeyake lonkundo wate bowa w' ola wa bankonk' akis'o, geographie ea Ingende mpe bola bekis'o. Tookake nsonyi totefele lokundó nga okumana we la bon' owola ane na mpoto. Mpe téféláka we la báná mpe liotsi like na lonkúndó. Ele mother tounge( Bonwá w' óla) eke.
Lenkina toeya isáumáka ete mpás' ele n' oola tosandje bale ndóla; baena mpasi na kalasi, bete bia bóngángá la bisengeli ndéngé la ndéngé. Tole báfáyá nna mpótó, bokol' omo tsifúta na bela bekiso. Basanga mpeyi n' olá ete: "BONDELE AFOFELE MPOTO" nna is' ompé efonge te tófélé bóla bokis'o. Okinyó Bólángálá: Imbile-ya-Nkanga ( EKUKOLA)
LES BONGILI D' INGENDE: EKUKOLA, MAKAKO, LOFELI, ELANGA, ENGONDJO-L' ONYEKA, MONKOSO,BOTEKA- FLANDRIA, BONGILI, IFUTO, BOAMBA...
Que c' est merveilleux!!!!!! Prière de cliquer sur le lien ci-dessous: Doc3 pour en savoir plus. Merci.




